The forces of compromise in the communist movement, promote as their ideal a line in which the CPs play a “supplementary” role to social-democracy in order to create a so-called “social majority for solidarity”. The model of “left unity” is promoted within this framework in Greece and more generally.
In relation to the question of alliances, the KKE did not submit to the pressure which has been exerted in Greece by the argument of “left unity”. An argument which in our country is supported by the member of the ELP, SYN. (This is a union of opportunist forces, some of which left the KKE in 1968 under the flag of eurocommunism and in 1991 under the banner of “Gorbachevism”)
The fact that the KKE has rejected the dead-end of so-called “left unity” means that the KKE has an alliance policy which responds to the interests of the working class, the popular strata, and the needs of the class struggle. We focus our attention on the socio-political alliance, which is based on the common action and common interests, on the common line of struggle of the working class, the urban and rural self-employed. An alliance that will come into conflict with the monopolies, imperialism, and at the same time struggle for another development path for our country, the path to the people’s power and economy, in which the means of production will be socialized, there will be central planning of the economy and workers’ control. For communists there can be no “intermediate power” or “intermediate system” between capitalism and socialism. For communists the People’s power and economy mean the socialist society.
The KKE assesses that you cannot have such a negative situation in the labour movement today where the partners of the ELP, the yellow bureaucrats of the ITUC, are dominant and on the other hand at the political level the existence of a radical political alliance.
Today the CPs have accumulated significant experience and can liberate themselves from the viewpoint that an alliance policy means joining together with forces which defected from the communist movement. The necessary conclusions must be drawn from this defection. This is because they did not withdraw from the ranks of the CPs and create opportunist parties and groups by accident, not because they simply disagreed with some details but with the essence, and they handed themselves over in submission to capitalism, and for the perpetuation of the exploitative system. Their answer to the crucial question “with the people or the monopolies?” is that both in theory and practice they are with the latter. And while they might invoke their communist roots, they wage a systematic anti-communist and anti-socialist attack against Marxism-Leninism; they seek the corruption and ideological-political disarmament of the CPs, their dissolution, their submersion into opportunist formations and vehicles which lead to the arms of social-democracy. Therefore these are not forces which “do not say things quite as well as the communists”, but forces which are hostile.
In place of the familiar welding together of the leaderships with opportunist formations and parties and social-democracy in the name of “left unity”, from which the communist movement has suffered so much in the past, the main duty today for the CPs is the mass liberation of working class and popular forces from the influence of the bourgeois parties, both social-democratic and liberal. On this basis the pre-conditions for the concentration of forces for the social alliance in Greece will be created, through the rallying of forces in common front of activity of the organizations of the All Militant Workers’ Front (PAME), the All Farmers’ Militant Rally (PASY), Nationwide Antimonopoly Rally of the Self-employed and the small Tradesman (PASEVE) , Greek Womens’ Federation (OGE) and the Students’ Militant Front (MAS). It is this common activity which will determine how quickly we will have a fully-formed socio-political alliance at a political level of the anti-monopoly anti-imperialist forces. Only this work can create bonds with the working class and popular masses. In any case the communist cannot build anything without persistent work amongst the masses, constantly guided by their strategic goal of socialism and by the alliance which will lead them there, by strengthening their party, which is the irreplaceable leader of the working class.
This is the political line which the KKE has followed since the departure of the opportunist forces in 1990, and it has been demonstrated that the KKE not only has not been “isolated from the masses”, as some had hoped, but has strengthened its bonds with the working class and popular masses. This is apparent from the mass mobilizations and strikes, where the communists were in the vanguard. It is also apparent from the election results, which is not the most important indicator for communists, but one of many. In the first elections after the split (1993) with the opportunists, the KKE received 4.5% (about 300,000 votes), in 2010 it received nearly 11% and 600,000 votes.
The goal of overthrowing imperialism rather than humanizing it is as relevant as ever for the KKE. For the KKE the stable front against opportunism is characteristic of our communist, Marxist-Leninist identity. This identity and its defence are today predicated upon the rejection of the ELP, its abandonment by the CPs which are either members or observers. This experience is not related to the peculiarities of each individual country. On the contrary they are part of the collective wealth of experience of the communist movement. They are principles which are necessary prerequisite in any period and are true for every CP so that they can meet the challenge of the harshest class struggle, overthrow the power of the capitalists and construct socialism-communism.